Her har du den mest kom­plette opda­ter­ing på sociale medi­er og dig­i­tal udvikling i mediebranchen. Du bliv­er holdt opdateret og spar­er mass­er af tid.

Dig­i­tal Ugerevy udgives af Lars K Jensen, der råd­giv­er, udvikler og arbe­jder med dig­i­tale medi­er og udvikling.

Præludi­um:
Dette har ikke være den letteste uge at lave en opsam­ling. Det amerikanske valg har over­skygget nærmest alt andet, og det sene resul­tat forstærk­er den dom­i­nans i mediebilledet.

Jeg har alligev­el forsøgt at se på andre ting end det, der han­dler om val­get – i erk­endelse af, at der trods alt også er sket andre ting 🙂

God læselyst!
// Lars

Du kan altid afmelde dig igen ved at bruge lin­ket i bun­den af hvert nyheds­brev

Leave this field emp­ty if you're human:

[toc]

Del 1: Sociale medier 

Her find­er du his­to­ri­er om eller fra de store sociale plat­forme, der har en enorm rolle at spille i kon­tak­ten mellem udgiver/afsender og mod­tager.

🇺🇸 Valget:

⚠️
Facebook og Twitter markerede Trump-opdatering om fusk

Medi­aWatch:
"Twit­ter og Face­book mark­er­er den amerikanske præsi­dent Don­ald Trumps opslag på sociale medi­er, hvor han skriv­er, at Demokrater­ne er ved at "sjæle val­get", som vil­dle­dende.

- Dele af eller hele ind­hold­et, der deles i dette tweet, bestrides og kan være vil­dle­dende med hen­syn til, hvor­dan man delt­ager i et valg eller en anden borg­er­pro­ces, skriv­er Twit­ter om Trumps opslag."

Læs artiklen

↓

"What Twit­ter Did After Trump Said Democ­rats Are Try­ing to “STEAL” the Elec­tion"
Slate

"Every­one knew that Trump would declare a pre­ma­ture vic­to­ry. Social plat­forms still stum­bled."
MIT Tech­nol­o­gy Review

↓

Casey New­ton sam­ler op i sit Plat­former-nyheds­brev:

How plat­forms fared in fight­ing the last war
Face­book and Twit­ter learned a lot of lessons in 2016. Did it help in 2020?

😬
YouTube klarede det mindre godt

Plat­former / Casey New­ton:
"Insid­er iden­ti­fied mul­ti­ple Elec­tion Day live streams in which sev­er­al chan­nels — includ­ing one with more than 1 mil­lion fol­low­ers — broad­cast fake elec­tion results to thou­sands of peo­ple, while earn­ing adver­tis­ing rev­enue on the streams the whole time. YouTube removed the videos after Insid­er report­ed them. 

Con­ser­v­a­tive pun­dit Steven Crow­der got 3.5 mil­lion views on a 5‑hour live stream in which he pro­mot­ed var­i­ous debunked vot­er fraud claims, Kevin Roose not­ed at the New York Times.

And the the far-right One Amer­i­ca News Net­work post­ed a video titled “Trump won. MSM hopes you don’t believe your eyes” that has racked up more than 300,000 views. Because YouTube has no pol­i­cy against pre­ma­ture­ly declar­ing vic­to­ry, all the video gets is the “results may not be final box” — at a time when, again, the results will not be final for weeks."

Læs nyheds­brevet

↓

"YouTube refus­es to remove video that appears to vio­late its poli­cies"
CNBC

👍
...men anbefalede dog færre konspirationsklip

The New York Times:
"New data now shows that the effort, which was com­plet­ed last year, most­ly worked. In the weeks lead­ing up to Tuesday’s elec­tion, YouTube rec­om­mend­ed far few­er fringe chan­nels along­side news videos than it did in 2016, which helped it to reduce its spread of dis­in­for­ma­tion, accord­ing to research by Guil­laume Chaslot, a for­mer Google engi­neer who helped build YouTube’s rec­om­men­da­tion engine and now stud­ies it."

Læs artiklen

✂️
Twitter klippede live-streaming af Trump-pressemøde

The Verge:
"Cable net­works, broad­cast net­works and Twit­ter cut short their broad­casts of Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s speech from the White House brief­ing room Thurs­day; some out­lets fact-checked the president’s unproven state­ments rather than car­ry them live."

Læs artiklen

😬
Trumps Twitter-særregler forsvinder ved nederlag

Som stat­sled­er er Trump ikke under­lagt de samme regler på Twit­ter som os andre. Det bety­der kort for­t­alt, at han kan tillade sig ting, vi ikke kan.

Men når han en dag ikke læn­gere er præsi­dent, forsvin­der de sær­re­gler. Bloomberg skriv­er:

"Trump will fall into the 'for­mer' group if he leaves office in Jan­u­ary, Twit­ter con­firmed. If that hap­pens, break­ing one of Twitter’s rules means his tweets may be removed entire­ly instead of labeled. He could also rack up 'strikes' for mul­ti­ple vio­la­tions, which would increase the sever­i­ty of pun­ish­ment issued from the com­pa­ny, and could lead to tem­po­rary account freezes, sus­pen­sions or even a per­ma­nent ban."

🛑
Steve Bannon blokeret på YouTube og Twitter

Det er sim­pelthen så vild en his­to­rie.

TechCrunch:
"Ban­non, speak­ing with co-host Jack Max­ey, was dis­cussing what Trump should do in a hypo­thet­i­cal sec­ond term. He sug­gest­ed fir­ing Wray and Fau­ci, but then went fur­ther, say­ing 'I’d actu­al­ly like to go back to the old times of Tudor Eng­land, I’d put the heads on pikes, right, I’d put them at the two cor­ners of the White House as a warn­ing to fed­er­al bureau­crats.'"

Læs artiklen

😱
Forsinket valgresultat er mareridt for platformene

TechCrunch:
"Of course, mis­in­for­ma­tion also thrives beyond Face­book, Twit­ter and even YouTube in places it’s more dif­fi­cult to track, mov­ing from obscure chans to main­stream social media and back again, mutat­ing as it goes. Ear­ly Wednes­day, Trump was hap­py to make his dan­ger­ous claim of unearned vic­to­ry on live tele­vi­sion — and so far, many news net­works oblig­ed by broad­cast­ing it. That’s cause for con­cern too."

Læs artiklen

🛑
Facebook lukker "Stop the Steal"-gruppe

Medi­aWatch:
"Grup­pen havde fået over 350.000 medlem­mer på et døgns tid.

Tilhæn­gere af den amerikanske præsi­dent, Don­ald Trump, brugte grup­pen til at poste mis­in­for­ma­tion og vold­elig retorik, opl­yser Face­book.

De organ­is­erede desu­den pro­test­er mod, at Det Demokratiske Par­ti ifølge dem er ved at "stjæle" val­get."

Læs artiklen

#️⃣
Facebook og TikTok måtte blokere hashtags

The Verge:
"Face­book and Tik­Tok have blocked hash­tags that were being used to spread mis­in­for­ma­tion and con­spir­a­cy the­o­ries about the pres­i­den­tial elec­tion. The hash­tags gen­er­al­ly revolved around unfound­ed claims that Democ­rats are try­ing to manip­u­late the elec­tion to defeat Pres­i­dent Trump."

Læs artiklen

↓

Tik­Tok takes down elec­tion mis­in­for­ma­tion aimed at younger users
Tik­Tok con­firmed today it has tak­en down videos spread­ing elec­tion mis­in­for­ma­tion that had been post­ed to two high-pro­file Repub­li­can-sup­port­ing accounts, The Repub­li­can Hype House and The Repub­li­can Boys. The accounts, pop­u­lar with young, con­ser­v­a­tive vot­ers, reach more than a mil­lion fol­low­ers com­bined, and have the poten­tial to reach even more users who would find their videos through oth­er means — such as hash­tags, shares or algo­rith­mic rec­om­men­da­tions.
TechCrunch

🧘‍♂️ Den "normale" hverdag:

↕️
Facebook tester (igen) op/ned-stemmer på kommentarer

Testen foregår i udval­gte grup­per, som du kan læse herun­der.

Social Media Today:
"As you can see in this image, post­ed by social media expert Matt Navar­ra, the new option, appear­ing in some groups, labels the up and down arrows with 'Yes'' or 'No', in response to the ques­tion:

'Is this com­ment valu­able to mem­bers of the group?'"

Læs artiklen

👊
Facebook fjener "ikke-autentisk netværk"

Reuters:
"Face­book FB.O on Fri­day said it has dis­man­tled sev­en sep­a­rate net­works of fake accounts and pages on its plat­form that were active in Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, Turkey, Moroc­co, Myan­mar, Geor­gia, and Ukraine due to 'coor­di­nat­ed inau­then­tic behav­iour'

The social media plat­form announced it had tak­en down the new net­works as part of its month­ly report into “coor­di­nat­ed inau­then­tic behav­iour”, which also not­ed Face­book had removed near­ly 8,000 pages involved in decep­tive cam­paigns around the world in Octo­ber."

Læs artiklen

😠
Facebook er ikke gode nok til at markere indhold

Colum­bia Jour­nal­ism Review:
"Our review of fact-check­ing labels on Face­book dur­ing this five-day peri­od found that the com­pa­ny failed to con­sis­tent­ly label con­tent flagged by its own third-par­ty part­ners. Facebook’s ten US fact-check­ing part­ners debunked over sev­en­ty claims. We iden­ti­fied over 1,100 posts across Face­book and Insta­gram con­tain­ing the debunked false­hoods; less than 50 per­cent bore fact-check­ing labels, even in instances where there were minor devi­a­tions from the orig­i­nal vet­ted posts."

Læs artiklen

🤷🏼‍♂️
Nye studier: Facebook diskriminerer ikke højrefløjen

Nie­man Lab:
"— A nine-month study by the pro­gres­sive non­prof­it Media Mat­ters, using Crowd­Tan­gle data, found both that par­ti­san con­tent (left and right) did bet­ter than non-par­ti­san con­tent and that “right-lean­ing pages con­sis­tent­ly earned more aver­age week­ly inter­ac­tions than either left-lean­ing or ide­o­log­i­cal­ly non­aligned pages.[…]

Between Jan­u­ary 1 and Sep­tem­ber 30, right-lean­ing Face­book pages tal­lied more than 6 bil­lion inter­ac­tions (reac­tions, com­ments, shares), or 43% of total inter­ac­tions earned by pages post­ing about Amer­i­can polit­i­cal news, despite account­ing for only 26% of posts.”"

Læs artiklen

🌙
Facebook ruller "Dark Mode" ud i app'en

Social Media Today:
"So, there it is. For those wait­ing on dark mode, the wait should soon be over, with Face­book begin­ning the new test­ing wave from today, pro­vid­ing you with a whole new col­or palette for your app."

Læs artiklen

👏
Instagram tester Story-reaktioner

Social Media Today:
"This could be inter­est­ing — Insta­gram looks to be test­ing a new option which would dis­play user reac­tions to Sto­ries on the sto­ry frame itself, as opposed to send­ing the cre­ator a DM."

Læs artiklen

📸
Instagram fjerner "Recent" fra hashtag-sider

NCBC:
"Face­book-owned Insta­gram on Thurs­day announced it will tem­porar­i­ly remove the “Recent” tab from hash­tag pages in an effort to reduce the spread of mis­in­for­ma­tion in the run-up to the Nov. 3 U.S. elec­tion.

“We’re doing this to reduce the real-time spread of poten­tial­ly harm­ful con­tent that could pop up around the elec­tion,” the social net­work said in a tweet."

Læs artiklen

🦈
Baby Shark er den mest sete YouTube-video nogensinde

CNET:
"The video has now been viewed more than 7.04 bil­lion times, pass­ing Luis Fonsi's hit song, Despaci­to, which isn't that far behind, top­ping 7.03 bil­lion views."

Læs artiklen

🐦
Twitter overvejede at købe Substack

Der har i ugens løb været rygter om, at nogle hos Twit­ter så sig lune på nyheds­brevst­jen­esten Sub­stack. Det kom­mer fra en pas­sage i denne The New York Times-artikel:

Anoth­er way of look­ing at Sub­stack is as a kind of Twit­ter Pre­mi­um — a place you can pay for more con­tent from your favorite jour­nal­ists. And that syn­er­gy has caught the atten­tion of some at Twit­ter itself, where the notion of acquir­ing the newslet­ter com­pa­ny has been dis­cussed inter­nal­ly, a per­son famil­iar with the con­ver­sa­tions said. 

Tanken om et Twit­ter-køb af Sub­stack er dog sjov at lege med – selvom det vil være en dårlig idé, skriv­er Simon Owens i sit nyheds­brev.

😬
Dorsey beholder sit job som Twitter-CEO

Medi­aWatch:
"Bestyrelsen vil dog fort­sat holde et vågent øje med Jack Dorseys gøren og laden som led­er hos Twit­ter, især under val­gafte­nen for det kom­mende amerikanske valg. Han har tidligere fået kri­tik for sin hånd­ter­ing af mediedæknin­gen på Twit­ter, skriv­er medi­et."

Læs artiklen

Del 2: Digitale tendenser

Her kan du læse nogle af ugens ten­denser inden­for medi­er. Det kan være en ny metode eller til­gang, branchen forsøger at tage til sig.

🗳
Sådan dækkede US-medier valgnatten

Nie­man Lab:
"There weren’t a ton of mean­ing­ful inno­va­tions in last night’s media cov­er­age — unless you count “cau­tion” as an inno­va­tion, which maybe you should. The added com­plex­i­ty of mas­sive ear­ly vot­ing and the still-fresh scars from 2016 gen­er­al­ly led to out­lets more will­ing to let the night devel­op. But it cer­tain­ly wasn’t a hap­py night for many view­ers, read­ers, and obses­sive doom­scrollers. Here are a few of the things we noticed."

Læs artiklen

🗣
The Wall Street Journal gør citatværktøj offentligt

Nie­man Lab:
"We tend to reach for our smart­phones or anoth­er Google-enabled device now, of course, but that impulse to mar­shal evi­dence as we dis­cuss and debate with our loved ones lives on. And it’s one of the rea­sons The Wall Street Jour­nal designed and debuted Talk2020, an exper­i­men­tal tool that allows read­ers to search a data­base of thou­sands of tran­scripts to see what the pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates have said about an issue.

Through exten­sive focus groups con­duct­ed last sum­mer, the Jour­nal found that read­ers want­ed to be able to quick­ly locate quotes and facts about a candidate’s record — and not just for their own edi­fi­ca­tion."

Læs artiklen

📻
Den Uafhængige laver morgenradio via app

Medietrends.dk:
"Den kom­mende mor­gen­ra­dio vil blive sendt direk­te alle hverdage via en ny app og selvom Asger Juhl ikke vil drage sam­men­ligninger med mor­gen­fladen, som han tidligere var en del af på Radio 24Syv, er der oplagte lighed­er:

”Vores mor­gen­ra­dio bliv­er uforudsigelig, over­rum­plende, inter­es­sant og kri­tisk. Vi læg­ger vægt på en lev­ende form, per­son­lige værter og gode kri­tiske inter­views. Hvis man ikke kan lide sådan noget, find­es der mange andre glim­rende mor­gen­flad­er,” siger Asger Juhl om det nye pro­jekt. "

Læs artiklen

⌫
Hvordan skal medier forholde sig til afpublicering?

Journalism.co.uk:
"Edi­tors are increas­ing­ly faced with requests to unpub­lish news con­tent. It could be from a young per­son haunt­ed by a sil­ly but high­ly SEO-friend­ly mishap from years ago now strug­gling to apply for uni­ver­si­ty or a job. Or maybe a read­er with men­tal health issues made more severe because of a pub­lished sto­ry. 

"Unpub­lish­ing depends on your moral com­pass," says Deb­o­rah Dwyer, 2020–2021 res­i­den­tial fel­low at the Reynolds Jour­nal­ism Insti­tute who spent sev­er­al years study­ing this issue."

Læs artiklen

🎶
Spotify er ved at blive sit platformsansvar bevidst

I sid­ste uges Ugerevy kunne læse, at Spo­ti­fy får kri­tik, for­di pod­cast-værten Joe Rogan (som Spo­ti­fy købte/ansatte for et kæmpe beløb) havde inviteret en kon­spir­a­tionste­o­retik­er (hvis eget pod­cast tidligere er blevet fjer­net fra netop Spo­ti­fy) i studi­et.

Hos Hot Pod har Nicholas Quah taget en snak med Casey New­ton (tidl. The Verge, der nu udgiv­er sit Plat­former-nyheds­brev) om Spo­ti­fys vok­sende ans­var som plat­form:

"I think we’re in the ear­ly stages of see­ing Spo­ti­fy even­tu­al­ly come around to imple­ment­ing many more restric­tions on the con­tent that even their own pod­casts will include. [...]

I think you’re going to start to see that turn with the Joe Rogan thing. This is their show pony. This is their biggest orig­i­nal con­tent deal ever, and he is a prob­lem­at­ic fig­ure. In this Alex Jones sit­u­a­tion, Rogan brought on some­body who has been de-plat­formed by many of the biggest plat­forms in the world. So I sus­pect this is the moment where Spo­ti­fy is cross­ing over being under­stood as infra­struc­ture towards being regard­ed as a pub­lish­er in a big way. Because they’re pay­ing Joe Rogan’s salary, they’re respon­si­ble for him in a way that even YouTube is not respon­si­ble for host­ing Joe Rogan, as he was just upload­ing videos there."

🎧
Spotify-test: Musikere og labels kan påvirke anbefalinger

TechCrunch:
"Spo­ti­fy announced today it will begin to test a new ser­vice that gives artists more of a say in how their music is dis­cov­ered on the Spo­ti­fy plat­form. At launch, the ser­vice will allow artists and labels to iden­ti­fy music that’s a pri­or­i­ty to them, and Spo­ti­fy will then add a sig­nal to help the music get sur­faced by its per­son­al­iza­tion algo­rithms. [...]

At launch, the pro­mo­tion­al rate will apply only in select areas of Spotify’s app, includ­ing Spo­ti­fy Radio and Auto­play. Pro­mot­ed tracks won’t appear on oth­er playlists, either algo­rith­mic or edi­to­r­i­al — though Spo­ti­fy isn’t rul­ing out expan­sion to these areas in the future."

Læs artiklen

Del 3: Business

Her kan du læse nogle af ugens his­to­ri­er og ten­denser inden­for for­ret­ning­sud­vikling i mediebranchen. Alt­så det, der han­dler om at tjene penge.

😲
Digitalt overhaler print hos The New York Times

The New York Times:
"As The New York Times oper­at­ed at full tilt through a fraught elec­tion — one of the most con­se­quen­tial votes in mod­ern Amer­i­can his­to­ry — the com­pa­ny announced a mile­stone: As of last week, it had topped sev­en mil­lion paid sub­scribers, a high.

The New York Times Com­pa­ny has bet on dig­i­tal read­ers as the future engine of its busi­ness since 2011, when it start­ed charg­ing for online con­tent — and it has large­ly been a good gam­ble. In the three-month peri­od end­ing in Sep­tem­ber, for the first time, the rev­enue from dig­i­tal sub­scribers was greater than the mon­ey the com­pa­ny brought in from print sub­scribers, The Times said Thurs­day as part of its third-quar­ter finan­cial report."

Læs artiklen

↓

"For the first time, The New York Times’ dig­i­tal sub­scrip­tions gen­er­ate more rev­enue than its print ones"
Nie­man Lab

🤝
Business Insider køber sig ind i Morning Brew-nyhedsbrevet

Morn­ing Brew:
"Word is they're worth some $$$ and every­one who under­es­ti­mat­ed them in high school has egg all over their face. Yes­ter­day, Insid­er Inc., par­ent of Busi­ness Insid­er, said it's buy­ing a con­trol­ling stake in dig­i­tal media start­up Morn­ing Brew at a report­ed val­u­a­tion of up to $75 mil­lion. "

Læs artiklen

🎧
Slates strategi for førstepartsdata går via podcast

Digi­day:
"The dig­i­tal news pub­lish­er and pod­cast pio­neer has start­ed push­ing Slate Select, an ad tar­get­ing prod­uct that allows adver­tis­ers to reach Slate’s audi­ence across both its sites and its pod­cast net­work using Slate’s first- par­ty data. [...]

'It def­i­nite­ly start­ed with a way to pro­vide bet­ter val­ue to our adver­tis­ing clients on the pod­cast side,” said Mark Mor­gioni, Slate’s direc­tor of research and data. “We seized on pod­casts as some­thing adver­tis­ers might want to retar­get against.'"

Læs artiklen

💰
Innovationsmediestøtte er uddelt

Jour­nal­is­ten:
"Medi­enævnet har netop uddelt knap 10 mil­lion­er kro­ner i medi­estøtte til eksis­terende og nye medi­er fra den såkaldte ‘Inno­va­tion­spul­je’.

I alt 17 medi­er har fået ja til at få medi­estøtte. 24 har fået afs­lag."

Læs artiklen

🛠
Washington Post bygger værktøj til kontekstuel annoncering

AdWeek:
"The offer­ing is called Wash­ing­ton Post Sig­nal. It’s pow­ered by the Post’s con­tex­tu­al tar­get­ing plat­form, Zeus Insights, which the com­pa­ny cre­at­ed in July 2019. The promise of Sig­nal is more sophis­ti­cat­ed ad tar­get­ing for buy­ers who aren’t reliant on third-par­ty cook­ies. The added lay­er of first-par­ty read­er data is also meant to dif­fer­en­ti­ate the capa­bil­i­ty from the basic para­me­ters of con­tex­tu­al ad tar­get­ing. "

Læs artiklen

🤩
Gannett når 1 mio. digitale abonnenter

USA Today:
"The com­pa­ny, which owns more than 260 dai­ly pub­li­ca­tions and hun­dreds of week­lies, report­ed a net loss of $31.3 mil­lion in the third quar­ter, com­pared with an $18.5 mil­lion loss in the same peri­od a year ear­li­er. [...]

Gan­nett report­ed that it sur­passed 1 mil­lion paid online-only sub­scrip­tions for the first time, record­ing a 31.1% increase from a year ear­li­er to 1.03 mil­lion. Online sub­scrip­tions are viewed as crit­i­cal to the suc­cess of media com­pa­nies in the dig­i­tal age as news­pa­per dol­lars decline."

Læs artiklen

💸
Sådan bruger verdens største annoncører deres penge

Digi­day:
"Digi­day ana­lyzed the most-recent earn­ings updates and calls from the top 10 ad spenders in the world, accord­ing to RECMA’s data for 2019 to see how they are adapt­ing their mar­ket­ing strate­gies to the ongo­ing cri­sis. RECMA’s data cal­cu­lates “inte­grat­ed spend­ing,” which com­bines “mon­i­tored spend” — such as TV, radio, print and out­door — and “non-tra­di­tion­al activ­i­ty” —such as dig­i­tal, data and con­tent.

The rank­ing also includes new entrants ver­sus 2018. Nes­tle, Expe­dia and Gen­er­al Motors now appear in the top 10, while Glax­o­SmithK­line (ranked #7 in 2018,) McDonald’s (#9) and Com­cast (#10) no longer fea­ture."

Læs artiklen

↓

"‘Our biggest quar­ter ever’: Pub­lish­ers’ ad busi­ness­es are rebound­ing into the end of the year — for now"
Digi­day

Del 4: Udvikling og tech

Her får du et kig på nogle af ugens his­to­ri­er inden­for den dig­i­tale udvikling og teknolo­gi, der enten direk­te eller indi­rek­te kan have betyd­ning for medier/udgivere.

🇫🇷
Apples sagsøges i Frankrig for kommende iOS 14-feature

What's New in Pub­lish­ing:
"The prob­lem dates back to June when Apple announced that, start­ing with iOS 14, app devel­op­ers wish­ing to access the device’s so-called Iden­ti­fi­er for Adver­tis­ers (“IDFA”) would need to first obtain opt-in user per­mis­sion through an Apple-designed pop-up box. The require­ment would apply to almost two mil­lion apps avail­able from the App Store."

Læs artiklen

📊
Tænk de rigtige data ind i produktplanlægningen

Pub­Ops:
"The Post and Couri­er of Charleston, South Car­oli­na,  grew its dig­i­tal sub­scrip­tions by 250% over two years by shift­ing its ana­lyt­ics focus from pageviews to engage­ment met­rics. Sto­ries that don’t get 500 unique vis­i­tors and at least 1.2 min­utes of engaged time are poten­tial­ly re-writ­ten and giv­en head­lines to improve per­for­mance."

Læs artiklen

🌐
Microsofts Edge-browser stiger i popularitet

Com­put­er­world:
"Flere og flere tager Microsofts Edge-brows­er til sig. Bru­gen af Microsoft-browseren stiger kraftigt, mens Googles Chrome til gengæld fort­sat taber markedan­dele."

Læs artiklen

🔒
Så er der omsider end-to-end-kryptering i Zoom

Wired:
"There are a few caveats before decid­ing whether you want to ful­ly end-to-end encrypt your Zoom calls. First is that Zoom meet­ings are encrypt­ed by default regard­less, just not end-to-end. Which is to say, they’re like­ly safe enough for most peo­ple most of the time.

You should absolute­ly flip the switch for sen­si­tive con­ver­sa­tions, but oth­er­wise, as you’ll see in a minute, it may be more trou­ble than it’s worth in a lot of instances.

Also remem­ber that encryp­tion isn’t mag­ic; the peo­ple that you’re talk­ing to could still share what­ev­er you say. And if any of your devices are com­pro­mised, well, you’re out of luck."

Læs artiklen

• Kategori: Opsamlinger